THE SECOND IN A SERIES OF MESSAGES ON EPHESIANS FOR BBCMP, DELIVERED 1/12/13
PM
TO THE SAINTS WHICH ARE AT EPHESUS
EPHESIANS 1:1-2
INTRODUCTION:
I will
be occasionally giving you more and different introductory information as we
proceed, but I won’t be doing another introduction. But I will be reaching back there to the
message last week again and again and pulling out a piece here and there that
may help us in understanding whatever text we are dealing with on that
day. Here’s one of them.
Dr. M.
L. Jones attempted to described the epistle by working in some of the prominent
words or expressions, and this is what he hammered out -
“In this
epistle, the apostle exults in and marvels at the glory and the mystery and the
riches of God’s way of redemption in Christ.”
He
quotes another writer who remarked,
“It is a letter
in which the apostle looks at the Christian’s salvation from the vantage point
of the heavenly places.”
And that makes sense, because in the other epistles, Paul
has more to say about salvation from our standpoint, and he wrestles with
issues. Martin Luther said that the
book of Romans was the most important document in the New Testament because it
is the place in which the gospel is found in its purest expression.
Indeed, there is no purer expression of the gospel than
that given in the epistle to the Romans.
But if the Epistle to the Romans is the purest expression of the gospel,
the Epistle to the Ephesians is the sublimest, and the most majestic expression
of it.
Jones says that he does not mean (about Eph.) the most direct expression of the gospel. Romans has basically one great theme –
justification by faith and its implications (4 solas). Paul comes as close to systematizing the
gospel in Romans as he ever cared to. And
then in his other Church Epistles, he tackles all manner of bad doctrine (legalism)
in Galatians, bad behavior in the Corinthians, bad philosophy in Colossians,
bad attitudes in Philippians, bad eschatology in the Thessalonians.
But here
in this Ephesian epistle, there is no issue, there are no controversies, there
is nothing being corrected. The
perspective is the broadest and most majestic.
There is no lengthy spelling out of the need for the gospel, or the
nature of the gospel. It is pure
exultation of Christ and the gospel at the outset followed by pure grateful practical
application after the mid-point.
It is
as if Paul is looking down on the panorama of God’s wonderful and glorious redemptive
work performed by Christ, from the vantage point of heaven itself. And at a few points along the way, Paul seems
to loose himself, and stumble over himself in trying to explain it.
·
PAUL 1:1
We
could go into the matter of Paul’s unique apostleship, his salvation and
calling on the Road to Damascus, his unique training, his singular revelation
of what he calls “the mystery of the gospel”, his missionary journeys and
more. But for now, I’ll be content to
just give you that litany of highlights.
·
AN
APOSTLE 1:1
It was
the highest calling in the Church.
The
word means “one sent”, or “sent one”. They
were sent with a message.
·
OF
JESUS CHRIST 1:1
Remember
that “of” is “off” with one “f”. He is
the source, and the foundation from which Paul reached out to them, and to us
in this epistle.
It is
Him that we represent and Him to Whom we should point, and Him that we should
never overlook. There
is no gospel without Him. There is no
salvation apart from Him. All God’s
gracious promises are carried out in, by, and through Christ from beginning to
end. If it is for our salvation, it is
in Christ. Much can be said about the
kindness and mercy of God. But without
Christ, it would avail us nothing.
We will
see again and again such themes as in Christ, by Christ, through (the blood of)
Christ. He’s everywhere. We’re blessed in Him (1:3), predestinated
unto adoption by Him (1:5), all things will be gathered in Him (1:10), our
trust is in Him (1:12), God’s divine power is wrought in Christ (1:20), and
that’s just the first chapter.
·
BY
THE WILL OF GOD 1:1
That is
to say, not just with God’s permission, or even approval, but by Divine
deliberate choosing and calling. No man
ought to take on himself the honor of Christian ministry. They will do more harm than good in the
Kingdom. Many are ordained to it that
never ought to have been. A more
stringent and uniform vetting process would help. So would proper preparation.
The
whole of our thinking should start with God.
We’re so interested in ourselves that we have forgotten God. But it’s all about God. Paul holds us face to face with God, who He
is and what He has done. It emphasizes
and attempts to describe the indescribable greatness and glory of God.
The
whole message of the Bible from beginning to end is to bring us back to God, to
reveal God, and to humble us before God.
Ephesians is singularly dedicated to that. I lack the literary skills to really expound
on it. But be aware that we are going to
be confronted with the glory and the majesty of God. We might want to take our shoes off our feet,
because we’re going to be standing on holy ground.
We are
going to be confronted with the Sovereignty of God. And we modern Americans are not conditioned
to swallow it. But previous generations
were highly occupied with it.
Notice
expressions such as;
- According to the good pleasure of His will
- In HimselF
- According to the counsel of his own will
The
Eternal and Everlasting self-sufficient God, from eternity to eternity, God is
the greatest theme of the Epistle.
Paul
does not begin by examining us. He turns
us away from ourselves to something much more interesting and beneficial – and
worthwhile. God, His works, and His mysterious
ways of dealing with men. He points us toward...
THE MYSTERY OF GOD
One of
the several “of God” things in the epistle is the Mystery of God. Of the
22 times the word mystery is used in Scr. (all N.T., btw) Paul uses all but
four of them. And 6 of those 18
times uses it are in Ephesians.
The
first time is in this chapter, in v. 9, and look carefully at it. When many people read the sort of things that
Paul has to say in the next several verses, they sometimes remark or even
complain that they can’t understand it.
They either can’t understand what he said, or they do understand it, but
they can’t understand how Paul could say such a thing or how it could be that
God would have done that in the way that He did.
What
they don’t realize is that no mortal mind can really cope with it. They should not be trying to understand it,
but simply accepting and believing that it is so according to the mystery of
His will.
Dr.
M.L. Jones said, not these exact words, but something like this - “O the folly
of trying to object to the mystery of his will.
He is infinite and eternal, we are finite and sinful. We don’t see, we don’t understand. People say, “God isn’t fair if that is
true!” They should put their hand with
horror on their mouth, and realize what they are saying and of Whom they are
speaking.”
Instead
of objecting to it, we should be filled with a sense of delight that we are
able to look in to it at all, however remotely and limited.
THE
GRACE OF GOD
This is
another outstanding idea in this little letter.
The phrase “grace of God” occurs only 3 times, but that’s more than
enough to inform us from whom it proceeds, by whom it is given or granted. But the word grace is used 12x – twice for
(not in) each chapter.
·
TO
THE SAINTS
That
would be everyone in Ephesus that had repented and believed the gospel. The RCC is un-Scriptural to withhold the
title from everyone but a few that they elevate to special status. That should be obvious. Not everything they believe and do is wrong,
but they are wrong about the gospel, wrong about the ordinances, and wrong about
a great deal more including this.
It is
best to avoid referring to Paul as “St. Paul” or Patrick of Ireland as “St.
Patrick”, although it is almost unavoidable to speak of St. Patricks Day. Of
course, all of them were saints to be sure.
But so was John Wesley, Charles Spurgeon, Isaac Watts, Martin Luther,
Jonathan Edwards, J. Grescham Machen, Francis Schaeffer, and Brother Billy Bob
from Bugtussle Arkansas. And to call St.
Athanasias by that designation is to imply that those I just named are not.
Now
that they were saints, when you consider what they had been, as Paul describes
them, is a truly marvelous thing. Acts
19 tells us something about what that city was like. And the same goes for us.
But what does the word
mean? The root word for the word
translated as saint simply means holy.
I gotta say, you don’t look holy to me.
And I probably don’t look holy to you.
But without disputation, the Bible says we are.
And when we come down to
the base of it, the word holy
signifies separation. Holy means “set apart.” The kind of separation which makes a person a
saint is separation to God – set apart, as it were, for His uses, in obedience to
His commandment, to be employed or handled however God may will.
You can see this in the Old
Testament as the designation 'holy' is applied to the high priest's mitre or to
the sacrificial vessels of the Temple the same way it was applied to the people
who used them.
So in those places, it didn’t
imply moral qualities at all, but simply that this person or that thing
belonged to God. But it would be
difficult to imagine a thing belonging to God and being employed by God for His
purposes unless it is somehow purified. So
by extension, the ordinary meaning of holiness has come to be moral purity and
cleanness from sin. And that meaning necessarily
flows down from the original meaning, separation and devotion to the service of
God.
And this is really
helpful in explaining what we should mean when we speak of Christian holiness. We belong to God, and we should be aware of
it. That fact distinguishes us few on
the narrow road from the many on the broad road, who have no thought at all of
God’s ownership, and have no inclination at all to yield themselves up to Him
for His use.
And there is more to
this than just positional standing.
There is an inevitable practical impact that comes from it. By imparting to us the Divine nature, when we
were saved, and creating us in Christ Jesus unto all good works …, we are set
up to run this way. We stumble, we fail,
we waver and wander. But God’s mark is
on us.
Just as you write your
name in your books, or on other things that you want to claim ownership of, God's
stamp of ownership upon a man, His 'mark,' by which He says—This man belongs to
Me, is holiness. He writes it with the
ink of the likeness of His own character.
So don’t despair. He that began a
good work in you will be faithful to complete it.
So, in God's church
there is no aristocracy of sanctity. My
work isn’t any holier than yours. You
don’t need to try and cultivate a mystical mindset to be called a saint. Right down where you live, in the middle of
all your day-to-day struggles and challenges, and mundane routines, you are
privileged to live the life of a saint.
Sainthood is about
knowing Who you belong to and Who you serve, and taking that knowledge with you
into every corner of your life, however poor, or simple or meaningless that may
seem to be at the time. The saint is the
man who simply knows, and says, “Lord, I am not my own, I belong to Thee. Do with me as You see fit, for Thy glory and
Thy pleasure, and whatever my hands find to do today, I commend it to You and
your Kingdom.
Do you pray anything of
the kind as you begin your day? All God’s
children are His saints. If your heart
utters nothing on its own like I just suggested, the reality of your sainthood
is in question.
·
WHICH
ARE AT EPHESUS
Bible
critics dispute that address, but there is no valid question about it. These were the primary intended
recipients.
It has
been suggested that the difference between the spiritual conditions of Corinth
and Ephesus was that Paul only spent 18 months in the former, but 3 years at
the latter. I think there is something
to it. But people are people – sinful,
petty, sensual, judgmental, griping, seditious, ungrateful and undependable no
matter how long you are with them and what you do for them or what you teach
them. But at least at the time of
writing, Paul knew of no problems there, and was able to do what he could not
do in any other epistle, and that is to sail among the clouds and marvel at the
wonders of God’s redemptive work in Christ.
·
AND
TO THE FAITHFUL IN CHRIST JESUS
That
would be us, or at least we would hope so.
But it does open the audience up from just the Ephesian believers.
·
GRACE
TO YOU AND PEACE, etc.
For
centuries Christians have used these words, or some version of them during the
worship service. One good protestant,
strongly anti-Romish commentator (Gordon H. Clark) wrote,
“The blessing,
benediction, or salutation of verse two may need some explanation, not because
of its difficulty, but because of its familiarity. We hear such benedictions in church every
Lord’s Day and are so accustomed to the phraseology that we forget its
meaning.”
And so I have learned to include an apostolic greeting in our Church order of service.
We will
have plenty to say about grace in the weeks to come. For now I’ll just say that grace can be
thought of as the cause of salvation. As
for peace, as it’s used here it is not a life of undisturbed tranquility free
from vexation or danger. It is with
reference to the change that has gone on in us, from our former enmity with God
to our new relationship with God as our adopted Father. Peace is the result of salvation.
These
things come from both the Father and the Son, and they come by means of our
union with Christ, and nothing else.
And we thank God for them once again.
Pastor Huff,
ReplyDeleteI'm very pleased & excited to see that you are posting here again.
To my shame, I don't begin my prayer time with him, and my morning, as you described.
I like where you wrote, "These things come from both the Father and the Son".
Look forward to more,
Gino
You are always an encouragement, Brother Gene.
Delete